Avey Tare's Slasher Flicks

INTERVIEW: Avey Tare on balancing good vibes with darkness and the long shadow of “My Girls”

The Animal Collective founder chats about his latest project, Avey Tare's Slasher Flicks.

- Apr 21, 2014

If you're surprised that Avey Tare followed up a brooding, electronic solo LP like Down There with a three-piece, "good vibes" group called Avey Tare's Slasher Flicks, you haven't been paying attention. A founding member of Animal Collective, the man also known as Dave Portner has been exploring genre and form for a decade and a half.

Enter The Slasher House is yet another chapter in a catalogue that exists gloriously outside of conventional definition. If it makes you smile, it feels like your face could turn inside out. If you feel like dancing, it's 'til your legs swell like a bodybuilder's. It's clear that for Portner, this latest skin  infectious, free-association pop, with the demeanor of a kid eager to tell you the next secret — fits him as comfortably as any other iteration of his sound.

I spoke to Portner about his restless creative spirit, what psychedelia means to him, how Animal Collective handled the Billboard-charting success of "My Girls," and the importance of spontaneity to live performance.

I’ve read that on your last solo album you were exploring a marshy atmosphere. Would you consider this new record an expedition in a similar sense?

I’m as interested in good vibe pop music as I am in intense dark music. I'm always trying to find a way to express all of that.

My previous solo record [Down There] was more of a conceptual thing that I had in my head for a really long time and just needed to get out, but did it in a very isolated, internal way. I didn’t really think of Down There as this collection of songs. It was more like a psychological movement, or something like that.

For [Enter The Slasher House], it's produced and put together in a way that flows like a record should. It’s more like going on a weird or fun haunted house ride, where there’s all these twists and turns. The songs are all over the place and different from each other.

The word psychedelic gets thrown around for your entire catalogue. What's your relationship to that word?

Avey Tare's Slasher Flicks - Strange Colores (Official Video)

It’s a really tough word to use. I feel like most of the time people will associate it with psychedelic drugs. More and more I find what I would consider psychedelic music existed before psychedelic drugs even came into the picture. A lot of early '60s jazz.

I feel like everyone has their own relationship to the word psychedelic. To me it’s this idea of things being something that they’re not, or perceiving something to be something else. Music can take on this other form that makes it psychedelic, this kind of psychological, psychotic aspect, where things are together but not together at the same time.

That lines up nicely with the whole aesthetic that you’ve constructed for this album. Were you trying to explore that grey area between horror and comedy?

Avey Tare's Slasher Flicks - Little Fang (Official Video)

I think so. I wouldn’t say it’s comedy, but if it makes someone smile, that’s okay. A lot of the genre of horror that I really appreciate has a campy side, like Roger Corman. His Edgar Allan Poe movies, they’re as much about humour and fun as they are creepy. I think blurring lines and having drastic shifts in emotion is a lot of what psychedelic music is about. Starting with something that’s really dark and upbeat, then taking it in the complete opposite direction, having these twists and turns.

Your career has certainly followed that path.

Yeah. I’m interested in a lot of that different stuff. I’m as interested in good vibe pop music as I am in intense dark music. I'm always trying to find a way to express all of that.

How do you focus on an initial concept for an album  like good vibes for Slasher House  while simultaneously exploring?

Blurring lines and drastic shifts in emotion is what psychedelic music is about. Starting with something that’s really dark and upbeat, then taking it in the complete opposite direction.

It’s a matter of the songs coming out that way, or me feeling like the songs I’ve collected or am writing generally together have that atmosphere. It feels like a lot of the songs I wrote in the past year had that element to it. I feel like I was in the mood to be a little bit more good-spirited. I guess the best example would be my last solo record where I maybe wasn’t in the best mood all the time. [It felt] okay to just do something a little more dark and out there.

I was also messing around with genres and music that I like a lot, which I don’t do so much when I’m writing for Animal Collective. It was messing around with song forms that were not '60s music  or '70s jazz, or bands like Steely Dan, stuff like that.

There’s an element of it that’s different from stuff that I’ve done, and that’s what I want. I don’t think anything is sort of lost, it’s just something different. I’m happy for it to be something different, and I think the next thing will be something different. I think a lot of people criticize or want to judge things based on what came before, which is fair if you really really like something that I or we’ve done in the past. It’s also okay for me if people don’t like it or think that something is better in the past. It’s cooler if it reaches other people.

After "My Girls" broke big, was there ever a sense within Animal Collective of “we have to match this” or “let’s see if we can do this again in a completely other different realm"?

Animal Collective - My Girls (2009)

I don’t think it’s ever about "we have to do that again." It’s not like "we tried to do that." We were really happy about it, but we were in that frame of mind back then. But now, I feel like we all want to embrace the moment. I could try really hard to make a straight forward pop record if I wanted to, but it’s not the kind of thing that interests me so much.

When bands like yours make these unexpected hits, there’s an expectation from some that you’ll do everything you can to try and replicate it.

I understand the notion of wanting to keep your popularity. Certainly we don’t want to lose any of the fans we’ve gained over the years. [But] it’s almost more interesting to pull people in with what we want to do, to try and make people understand.

Not to say people don’t get it, because I think that’s insulting to say to somebody “oh, you just don’t get the music.” Music for me, it’s all circumstantial, about where you are and how you’re hearing it. I’ll hear something and be like “I don’t get it, I don’t like this record.” Maybe it’s a record by a band I've liked in the past or maybe it’s just something new. Or I’ll hear it some other time and I’ll see the band live and totally get it

With Slasher Flicks, there’s an opportunity for what you just described to happen. People can hear it now, and hear a good vibes album, and then later on listen to it and be like “Oh, this is a lot creepier than I originally thought.” Or some totally different reaction.

I understand the notion of wanting to keep your popularity. [But] it’s almost more interesting to pull people in with what we want to do.

This album isn’t even that crazy. I’ll get that a lot with people criticizing this record, "Oh it’s crazy, there’s too much happening at the same time." But for me that’s not really what I hear, so a lot of the times I’m just like "No, what? You don’t understand. There’s three people playing live." But at the same time I can step outside of myself and be like "Oh yeah. Okay, it’s pretty crazy."

That’s one thing I strive for, to make records where there’s things hidden in there. Even my closest friends and the people that I would assume would get it hearing it the first time, have written to me about certain songs, saying “Oh, that part finally clicked for me.” I like records like that. It is very intentional.

When it comes to the live shows, how do you juggle audience expectations for bigger tracks, with a desire to do something new and perhaps more memorable?

Avey Tare's Slasher Flicks in Baltimore (first show) 1/2

For me it's letting a live show just sort of be. It’s something happening in the moment, as the word "live" would present itself. Not holding yourself to the notion of it having to be this way or being dogmatic, like "we have to play this song." With the Slasher Flicks shows, we’re playing the songs from the record. We’re all open to the moment. We all come from playing music in live settings long enough that we know you can’t really predict what happens sometimes. And for me I’ve always used that to my advantage, or at least hoped it would work to my advantage.

With Animal Collective, when we first started playing live it was more up in the air. Like, we would just hope we could get through a set. We didn't give ourselves enough time to practice. Even in Slasher Flicks, I feel like we don’t want to be over-practiced. It’s more fun if you’re building during the tour as it goes along. When you’re playing in front of people it becomes this experience that you want to be new and fresh, because they’re experiencing it too. It’s hard to know all the time how exactly it’s going to sound going club to club, so it’s good to let the current environment take it where it goes.

Discuss this on Facebook and Twitter

Share on Tumblr

Related Posts